UK News

Bruce Lehrmann rape trial jury despatched again to deliberate after saying it was unable to agree on verdict


Judges within the trial of accused rapist Bruce Lehrmann had been requested to assessment the proof after telling the decide they might not attain a verdict.

Mr Lehrmann, a former Liberal worker, is accused of raping then-colleague Brittany Higgins within the minister’s workplace at Parliament Home in 2019.

Mr Lehrmann pleaded not responsible and stated no sexual exercise passed off between the 2.

After greater than 4 days of deliberation, 12 jurors forwarded a be aware to ACT Chief Justice Lucy McCallum saying they might not agree on a unanimous verdict.

The decide referred to as the jurors again to the courtroom shortly after to encourage them to rethink their place.

“Judges are sometimes reluctant to discharge juries as a result of expertise exhibits that juries can usually agree, given extra time,” Justice McCallum stated.

“Every of you has sworn or affirmed that you’ll make a real judgment in line with the proof.

“And, as I informed you yesterday morning, that’s in the end your solely expectation and that is a crucial accountability.”

The ACT requires a unanimous determination for a responsible or not responsible verdict.

The jurors then requested the decide to go away and return to contemplate the proof tomorrow.

Chief Justice McCallum inspired them to take a break and attempt to calm down, and thanked them for “continued laborious work”.

Yesterday morning, the jury interrupted the deliberation to ask how a lot time the decide needed to give a verdict.

The chief justice reassured them with no expectations and informed them to not rush.

“You are taking on a regular basis you want,” she says.


Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Back to top button